Welcome to the IQA website

Login or register to take part in discussions in the forums and comment on news items.

Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

news, slider

The Monday Snitch–March 4

by Andy Marmer | March 4th, 2013

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the New York Badassilisks had received a World Cup bid. The IQA editorial team regrets the error.

And with this weekend’s action in the books, the final six Division I spots for the World Cup have been decided. No. 10 University of Miami (Coral Gables, FL), No. 84 Tennessee Tech University (Cookeville, TN), No. 116 University of Florida (Gainesville, FL), No. 105 University of Southern Mississippi (Hattiesburg, MS), No. 118 Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL), and No. 29 University of South Florida (Tampa, FL) have all earned trips to sunny Kissimmee for the World Cup.

Screen Shot 2013-02-18 at 12.25.08 AM
Southern Regional

Recap: In dominant fashion, the University of Miami – long thought to be the class of the South – captured the Southern Regional Championship. In pool play, Miami outscored their opponents 810-70, allowing just four goals and one snitch catch across their five pool games. To continue talking about Miami’s performance can’t do justice to just how controlling that squad was. After this weekend, it’s clear that no team in their region is on the same level.

Outside of Miami’s transcendence, nothing went as expected in the Southern Regional Championship. Despite a 120*-0 loss in the championship game, Tennessee Tech should be proud of their performance this weekend. A relatively new squad, founded in the spring of 2012, this group took out defending runner-up Florida in the semifinals 110*-50. One can note that Florida was competing in the World Cup before Tennessee Tech’s team even existed. The rapid ascension of Tennessee Tech is very impressive.

To reach the semifinals, Tennessee Tech knocked off a Florida State squad that they lost to just three weeks ago, 50*-10 at the Rocky Top Rumble. Tennessee Tech entered bracket play as the third seed from their group, after losses to Florida and South Florida in pool play 110*-60 and 60*-30, keeping both games within snitch range.

Tennessee Tech’s upsets of both Florida State and Florida were not the only ones during bracket play. In the quarterfinals, Southern Mississippi, after a 3-2 performance in their group, knocked off  South Florida, a team with a record that was previously 5-1, in a game that ended 60*-30. While Southern Mississippi is certainly a strong team in the South, having cut their teeth against the best of the Southwest, South Florida was predicted by many to face Miami in the title game. For them to bow out in quarterfinals is unquestionably a disappointment, in addition to their pool play loss to Florida.

Ringling College of Art and Design (Sarasota, FL) was thought to have a good shot at the World Cup, but after a 2-4 performance in pool play, they failed to advance to the brackets and missed out on a chance to play in their third straight World Cup.

Rising: Miami (they won as expected, but I don’t think it’s even possible to predict this level of dominance), Tennessee Tech, Southern Mississippi
Falling: South Florida, Florida State, Florida, Ringling

Shell Shocking Spectacular

Recap: 19 teams, including three mercenary squads, from the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast travelled to College Park, MD for the annual Shell Shocking Spectacular hosted by No. 2 University of Maryland (College Park, MD). While the hosts stumbled once in pool play, they nonetheless took the title over No. 16 Hofstra University (Hempstead, NY) 70*-40 in a rematch of last year’s title match with an off-pitch snitch grab.

Maryland earned the fifth seed entering bracket play after being defeated once in their pool by a mercenary team in an unofficial game. Despite the low seed, Maryland beat World Cup qualifiers No. 44 University of Richmond (Richmond, VA), and No. 27 Q.C. Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA) to reach the finals. Maryland’s matchup with Hofstra was a rematch of a contest from last week’s Empire Classic, hosted by the latter team, a matchup Maryland also won.

Hofstra reached the finals with bracket play victories over a pair of World Cup qualifiers: 11th-seeded, No. 30 Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD), who pulled two upsets of their own to reach the semifinals, and  No. 57 Macaulay Honors College (New York, NY), a rematch from last week’s tournament as well in bracket play. Additionally, Hofstra went undefeated in pool play, besting World Cup-qualifiers Virginia Commonwealth University (Richmond, VA), as well as University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA) in overtime.

Pittsburgh entered bracket play as the top seed, going 4-0 in pool play, before bowing out in the semifinals, after a win over a mercenary team in the quarterfinals, to Maryland, 150*-30.

Rising: Richmond (fourth place is an impressive showing), Johns Hopkins (semifinals), Maryland (stumbled once in an unofficial game), Hofstra (undefeated except for a 30-point loss to Maryland), Virginia (sixth seed over a number of World Cup qualifiers)

Falling: Rochester

15 Responses to “The Monday Snitch–March 4”

Jamin

March 4, 2013

8:27 pm

Love how FSU is falling after only losing to the top two teams and going 5-2. For a newer team to qualify for world cup I would automatically assume they are rising.

    propic

    John

    March 5, 2013

    12:28 am

    Yeah, that seems odd. I would assume the same. Same with UF. UF hasn’t been the best at the last couple of tournaments, but they ended up in 3rd place overall at the tournament. Seems like a rise to me.

propic

Harry

March 4, 2013

11:43 pm

The badassalisks didn’t qualify for world cup…

    Logan Anbinder

    Admin

    March 5, 2013

    10:22 am

    That’s correct, Harry; sorry for the error! The article has been revised.

      Jared

      March 5, 2013

      5:54 pm

      Way to remind the teacher that there’s homework harry;)

Grant

March 5, 2013

8:53 am

Rochester: Loses to UMD and the merc team that beat UMD in pool play, both by relatively low margins, followed by a loss on a snitch pull to Macaulay.

I love how you explain that in your article before you describe us as “falling.”

But you don’t. Literally less than 30 words.

Andy Marmer

March 5, 2013

5:57 pm

Thank you all for reading and for your feedback.

In the rising and falling section, I attempt to answer the question: if you told the team the result prior to the tournament, would they be happy. In the case of all three teams mentioned, I think they would be upset with how they were eliminated.

Sandi

March 6, 2013

3:12 pm

Fair enough. We were happy with how we played keeping UMD to/almost within snitch range (20-70 before the pull) and kissing to th pull on our next two games. Whether or not the right call was made pretty much any time would be upset for losing a game to a contested pull in which the snitch said your teams pull was clean but the snitch ref reset it and the other team ended up pulling. I don’t if I would consider that falling though but so be it.

    Sandi

    March 6, 2013

    3:12 pm

    *missing

Billy

March 6, 2013

4:24 pm

I love how Florida State, a team originally called the 5th best team in Florida, places in the top 4 Florida teams also earning a spot and finishing the Tournament losing only to the two teams placing in the finals of the Regional Competition.

    Andy Marmer

    March 6, 2013

    6:07 pm

    FSU beat Tennessee Tech a few weeks ago, 50*-10 at the Rocky Top Rumble. FSU played well, but I think it’s a let down that they fell to a team they had already beaten, even if they did well overall (and I do believe they did well overall).

Andy Marmer

March 6, 2013

8:26 pm

I’d also like to clarify that Richmond earned the fourth seed, but did not necessarily finish fourth as there was no third-place game.

    Minnich 3000

    March 7, 2013

    4:50 pm

    That 4th seed was earned, going 4-0 in pool play including a win over Johns Hopkins. Richmond was on fire but had the unfortunate draw of UMD in their first game of bracket play (due to UMD going 3-1, 5th seed — 4-5 matchup)

      Andy Marmer

      March 7, 2013

      8:08 pm

      I didn’t mean to take anything away from Richmond (quite the contrary actually). There was just some confusion about me stating that Richmond finished in fourth place. A reader thought that I was implying overall; I was attempting to clarify that there was no overall fourth place finisher, but rather that Richmond was the No. 4 seed.

      Sorry for any confusion

MiguelAO

March 8, 2013

8:16 pm

YES! My Hippogriffs Made it to the Grand stage!

Leave a Reply